Very few drugs, trial sites in search for Ebola cure: WHO

Of the more than 120 test Ebola drugs put forward, only a very small number are both suitable and available for human trial.

ONLY a handful of drugs could potentially be tested on humans in the search for an Ebola cure, with even fewer sites equipped to host such trials, the World Health Organization (WHO) said Friday.

The UN health agency briefing came a day after aid agency Doctors Without Borders said it would begin unprecedented trials of two antivirals, as well as the use of survivors’ blood as therapy, on patients in west Africa.

There is no specific treatment regime for Ebola, which has killed more than 5,160 people, mainly in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone, and the WHO has endorsed rushing possible treatments to trial in a bid to stem its murderous rampage.

But technical and scientific experts meeting in Geneva found numerous stumbling blocks to patient trials, the agency said.

Of the more than 120 drugs put forward to the agency, only a very small number are both suitable and available for human trial, Martin Friede of the WHO’s public health, innovation and intellectual property division, told reporters.

“We don’t have actually a lot of drugs in our pipeline that look promising,” he said.

The number of sites suited to carrying out tests on Ebola patients is also very limited, forcing WHO to further narrow its focus to a handful of drugs.

A key problem was that the drugs showing the most promise in animal trials are novel ones, like ZMapp, that are in very short supply and would be near impossible to scale up to a level that would allow proper testing.

“Conducting large clinical trials with these drugs is therefore going to be very difficult, if not impossible,” he explained.

Isolated trials inconclusive 

Friede also said the use of some of the drugs on 18 patients evacuated from west Africa—most of whom survived—was no help in determining if they actually worked.

This was because they were given various combinations of drugs and had also received far higher quality of care than most patients in west Africa.

“It was impossible to draw any conclusion” on safety or efficacy from such isolated trials, he said.

This week’s expert meeting pinpointed antiviral drug favipiravir, which works against influenza, and brincidofovir, used against adenovirus and cytomegalovirus as good candidates for trials.

Acting on the WHO experts’ recommendation, MSF selected the two antivirals for its trials in west Africa.

Interferons could also be possible candidates, Friede said, adding that the experts had also discussed breast cancer drug toremifene, but found significant “safety concerns.”

Where to conduct the tests was a major challenge, he said.

Because a good standard of overall care has a significant impact on Ebola survival rates, tests must be carried out across sites with consistently high care quality, as well as the infrastructure to support large clinical trials.

“We discovered in this meeting that there are no more than a handful of sites where such trials could actually be conducted under good conditions,” Friede said.

Related Content

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus